The American embassy in Israel has been moved
from Tel Aviv - where many nations still have theirs - to Jerusalem. Though many students of American foreign policy
believe this to be an unwise move, many feel that this was the right thing to
do and has been too long in coming. The
nation of Israel claims Jerusalem to be its capital, though many Palestinians
claim East Jerusalem is, or at least should be their capital - the capital of
the Arab West Bank.
Our President claims that this move will
ultimately lead to peace in the Middle East, without (of course) specifying how
this is to occur. Mr. Trump is lauded as
a hero in Israel, with great ceremonies commending this move by America and its
President. Speakers in these ceremonies
include prominent "Evangelical" preachers. Meanwhile the conflict between Israel and its
neighbors seems more volatile, while deadly demonstrations by Palestinians are
carried on. (Of course the
"deadly" applies to the Palestinians, not the Israelis - 50+
Palestinians dead and innumerable wounded.)
Many in the American Evangelical community
are rejoicing in this action, some seem almost giddy. Why is this?
A large number of Evangelical Christians hold
to a theological system known as Dispensationalism, even though many who hold
this position may never have heard the word.
Dispensationalists take pride in "rightly dividing the Word of
Truth," in noting the distinctions made in the Scriptures. To some extent this is an excellent way to
interpret the Scriptures. But sometimes
Dispensationalists make distinctions where the Bible is not that clear. And they also at times carry those
distinctions to illogical conclusions.
Dispensationalists distinguish (as do many
Christians) between God's Old Covenant people and His New Covenant people,
between the nation of Israel of the Old Testament and the Church of the New,
between Judaism and Christianity. They
do not however see the Church (Christianity) as a continuation of God's promises,
expanded to include both Jews and non Jews who believe in Christ. They seem to
ignore Paul's words, "So then, know this; that those who are of faith,
these are sons of Abraham" (Galatians 3:7).
Dispensationalists see Israel as a people set
aside until the end times when God will again deal with them. "And so all Israel will be saved, as it
is written, 'The Deliverer will come from Zion to turn away ungodliness from
Jacob'" (Romans 11:26; Isaiah 59:20).
And many see the birth of the present (secular) nation of Israel in
1948, and the following events as the
fulfillment of biblical prophecy.
According to Dispensationalist eschatology (the doctrine of last things)
the nation of Israel, scattered for millennia, must be back in their land and
undergo seven years of "Great Tribulation" before Jesus returns. The recent move is seen as one more step in
that direction.
And this eschatology has led some (not all)
Dispensationalists to a strange devotion and commitment to a foreign
nation. Some even refer to themselves as
"Christian Zionists." Many
American Dispensationalists appear to place their loyalty to Israel above their
loyalty to their own country. The nation
of Israel is regarded not simply as an American ally in the Middle East, nor
even as the homeland of a people who have been homeless for 2,000 years. Israel in the land is regarded by them as the
fulfillment of prophecy. To disregard Israel
is considered to be akin to heresy.
And so many Dispensationalists and other
Evangelicals demand that the U. S. government support Israel both financially
and militarily. A great part of the pro-Israel
lobby is in fact, not Jewish but "Christian." There are even "Christian"
organizations that support Israel and even promote the sending of Jews back to
the land.
But why is this? Though I no longer consider myself a Dispensationalist,
even when I thought I was one I had second thoughts on this position. If Israel's return to the land is a
fulfillment of prophecy - and I'm not sure it is - then God is the principle
Actor in this drama. Does He need the
help of well-meaning American Evangelicals?
Why should we rejoice over this nation?
Why should we seek to protect it?
Do we expect to prevent the "Great Tribulation"? Or are we actually hoping to bring it on?
When the New Testament was being written, the
land of Judea, at that time a Roman province with similar boundaries, was going
through political turmoil. Their
conflicts led to a revolt against their Roman overlords, ultimately leading to
the destruction of Jerusalem and the deportation of the Jewish people. Jesus prophesied these occurrences, and some
think the Book of Revelation may also speak of these. Yet nowhere are Christians of that day urged
to support Israel financially or militarily.
In fact the Biblical writers Paul and Peter urge submission to the very
government that would soon destroy their homeland.
The New Testament is clear as to what our obligations
as followers of Christ are to our fellow human beings: we are to love them as we love ourselves; we
are to "go and disciple all the nations." Distinctions are not made as to which people
or which nations deserve our concern.
Peter says that we - the church - are "a
holy nation, a people for His own possession." It is this "nation" to which our
allegiance belongs.
1 comment:
I don't understand their contradictory views -
(1) Israel can do no wrong so we must protect them even when they commit atrocious acts
(2) they want this so Israel can go thru tribulation & have their world explode, while the Christians are raptures & no longer protecting them
I also don't understand their view of love -
we can't wait to be with Jesus so let's hurry up and bring on the destruction of mankind, including the people they love.
And lastly I don't understand their view of God -
a god so weak He needs them to orchestrate the end-times even tho only he knows when it will be.
Making excuses for Israel's crimes against Palestinians is not loving our neighbors or our friends.
Neither is praying for Armageddon.
Post a Comment