The
book is Real Marriage; the Truth About Sex, Friendship and Life Together
by Mark and Grace Driscoll. Mark is the
pastor of Mars Hill Church, a megachurch in Seattle, which he and Grace started
in 1996.
[Actually
the reason I chose to read the book is that I was asked to watch the video
series of the same name on the internet.
I was informed by friends that it had been of tremendous help in their
marriages. As I couldn’t imagine staring
at a computer screen for hours, I decided to buy the book instead. The fact is that I find sermons a bit boring,
especially on a small screen. With a
book, I can pick it up or put it down at my leisure; I can also highlight or
mark areas which I want to question or discuss.
And after putting off writing this review for a few weeks, a book is
much easier to go back over. Besides all
that, I’m a dinosaur. I’m more
comfortable with a book in my hand than a laptop.]
This
book has apparently been of help in many marriages and comes highly recommended
by pastors, teachers and authors – 3 pages of enthusiastic blurbs.
The
Preface was in some ways encouraging to my skeptical eyes. It sets the pace for our reading of the book
with a series of “don’ts” explaining to us “some ways not to read it.”
Unfortunately,
as I read the book, I was drawn back to some of these “don’ts.”
·
“Don’t
read as a voyeur trying to figure out our sex life.” Sorry, but Mark and Grace reveal so much about their sex
life that one doesn’t need to be a voyeur to try to figure it out. Their story of her shame and his inability to
forgive was difficult for me to comprehend.
They freely tell of their sexual activities before marriage, but somehow
one act by Grace became a crisis leading to her shame and his unforgiving spirit.
·
“Don’t
read as a critic trying to find where you think we might be wrong.” Again, I’m sorry but that’s the way I
read. I read a book like this as a
pastor, teacher and counselor. I seek to
sort out the good from the bad – not just the useless, but that which I feel
might be in some way harmful to the undiscerning reader.
·
Some
of the other “don’ts” seem to be claims of authority for this book that it
doesn’t really have. This bothers me.
·
I
agreed with the final one: “Don’t copy
our methods. The principles … are more
important than the methods. Principles
are timeless and unchanging. Methods
vary … Hold fast to biblical principles and remain flexible and teachable with
methods for your marriage.” A great
exhortation to the reader. However, the
authors themselves often fail to make the distinction between biblical
principles and simple methods of applying those principles. And they don’t always make the distinction
between biblical principles and those principles derived from other
sources. This failure is one of the
great weaknesses of the book.
The
first five chapters (Part 1 MARRIAGE) are mostly ramblings, containing personal
stories, good advice and a few biblical principles, although one must be
careful and “examine the Scriptures … to see whether these things are so” (Acts
17:11). Some of the handling of biblical
texts is downright sloppy. One example
is Grace’s retelling of the story of Esther to picture her as an “example
(that) illustrates the repeated command across all Scripture that wives
respectfully submit to their husbands” (page 65). It does no such thing!
It
is in Part 2 SEX, that the book comes close to living up to its reputation for
both openness and controversy. It is
here, I am told, that it speaks to the present generation. And certainly, I’d say, it tries to be more
open and frank.
Chapter: Sex: God,
Gross, or Gift? Is probably the best chapter in the book and it does speak well
to the present generation which, though saturated with sexual images, stimuli and “freedoms” has as many or more hang-ups as
my generation.
I
did resent the statement that “… one source of the sex-as-gross view is
religious and sexually prudish older women who … teach younger women that sex
is for husbands and babies but not for personal pleasure” (page 117). I happen to be married to a “religious” but not
“sexually prudish older woman.” In my
personal experience I have found sexual hang-ups just as common among younger
people - even the irreligious - who have disconnected sex from love.
Chapters
7 and 8 on abuse and porn are well done and Chapter 9, Selfish Lovers and
Servant Lovers, is excellent. I would strongly
disagree, however, with one item in the list “Ways We Are Selfish Lovers”
(pages 165-167). Somehow, to “only have
sex when we both feel like it at the same time” does not seem to me to be
selfish. I cannot imagine sex with my
wife when either of us did not feel like it.
Apparently this generation has forgotten the concept of “wooing” and “flirting”
with one’s spouse. Of course, sometimes
the magic works and sometimes it doesn’t.
It is then we must respect the other’s lack of desire.
I
have mixed feeling about Chapter 10 Can We ________? The ageistic prejudices of the authors show
in the put-down (disguised as a warning) in the opening paragraphs “If you are
older, from a highly conservative religious background, live far away from a
major city, do not spend much time on the Internet, or do not have cable
television, the odds are that you will want to read this chapter while sitting
down, with the medics ready on speed dial” (page 177). Follow this up with the introduction to 1
Corinthians which begins on the same page.
The list of the Corinthians’ questions mentioned on pages 177 and 178 is
pure fiction.
In
this chapter are a number of questions regarding sexual activities between a
married couple. The questions are in
regard to various sexual practices, many of which might seem normal to some,
while to others they might seem downright kinky!
To
each of these activities the authors apply three questions taken from 1
Corinthians 6:12. These are excellent
and I believe should be used in every ethical decision we make, not just in the
area of sex. The questions are:
·
Is
it lawful?
·
Is
it helpful?
·
Is
it enslaving?
However,
if I may, I’d like to add some comments from an older generation’s
perspective.
·
First,
love must be the prevailing motive. As
the previous chapter makes clear, we are to be servant lovers. Many of these activities will be seen as at
best distasteful to one (if not both) of the partners. If so, they should be off the table (or to be
accurate, the bed).
·
Secondly,
though variety may spice up our sexual activity, it should not be our main
goal. Sooner or later, everything
becomes old hat. Do the math. If a couple has sex only twice a week, by the
time they have been married for 20 years, they will have had sex 20x52x2=2080
times! There’s bound to be some repetition.
·
Sometimes
the familiar is the most comforting and pleasurable.
·
I
fear that variety itself could be enslaving and desire for it could lead to
seeking it elsewhere.
The
last chapter (11) is entitled: “Reverse
Engineering Your Life and Marriage.”
This one seemed to me to be rather bizarre. It involves homework (Mark gives it to Grace,
of course) and questions about various issues in marriage, looking back over a
couple’s marriage. This is to me just a
series of useless exercises and can become a form of legalism. As Uni and I look back from near the last
days of our lives and marriage, we have no regrets that we have spent little
time making lists. (We have spent a lot
of time talking; why make lists? - Uni)
So,
now as I look back over what I have written I have to ask if I would recommend
this book.
Well
not to the ones it is apparently written for – those with troubled
marriages. While some portions of it
would definitely be helpful, others might add to the confusion. I would recommend the book with reservations
to those whose marriages are not troubled and who are also able to discern what
is biblical and what is not and what is wise and what is not.
It
is difficult to argue with the successes claimed for this book and the video
series. However, I do know that the Holy
Spirit is able to take our flawed efforts and use them for God’s glory. If He has done this in those successful
marriages claimed, then so be it. To Him
be the glory!
If
anyone desires to read more of my thoughts on these matters, simply click on
the words “love” and “marriage” in the topics column of this blog.
3 comments:
The ageism you spoke of is sad in the description, "...older, prudish women," a sad note indeed. I'm glad you called it out. While '96 isn't exactly current, I was a little surprised to see the stereotype. I appreciate your insights throughout.
Thank you, peace and all good,
Diane
Diane: Thanks for the comment. The year '96 was the year they started the church; the book was published this year.
remember Dad not to assume others have your experience - twice a week for twenty years - bwahaha
Post a Comment