"And He found in the temple those
selling oxen and sheep and pigeons, and the money-changers sitting there. And He made a whip out of cords and drove
them all out of the temple with the sheep and the oxen. And He poured out the coins of the
money-changers and overturned their tables.
And He said to those selling the pigeons, 'Take these things out of
here! Stop making My Father's house into
a shopping mall!' And His disciples
remembered that it is written, 'Zeal for your house will consume me!'"
John 2:14-17.
John records this incident as occurring
early in Jesus' ministry; the other Gospels record a similar event taking place
in Jesus' final week. In fact, Matthew
tells us He accused the money-changers of making the temple "a den of
thieves."
It doesn't take a great amount of
imagination to visualize this scene.
Cattle and sheep running in all directions, confused merchants
attempting to keep their animals from running away. We can hear the mooing and baaing and the
money rattling all over the floor; it's a smelly, noisy, chaotic mess. And in the middle of it all is Jesus,
violently swinging His scourge. Is He
angry? Somehow we can't picture Him as
not angry; fire is in His eyes, His voice is raised to a shout.
There are times when even the Savior seems
out of control in His anger. And this
was not the only incident.
Saturday, August 12, 2017, the
"Alt-right" held a rally in Charlottesville, VA. Various reasons were
given for this rally, the ostensible reason being to protest the taking down of
a confederate statue. But the real
motive was clear: it was an opportunity
for neo-Nazis and the KKK, along with other right-wing hate groups to have a
show of force.
Others gathered to protest the rally. The climax came when one of the
"Alt-rights" drove his car into a crowd of those who were protesting
them, killing a young woman and seriously injuring many more. Had he not slammed into another car we can
only assume he would have continued on his deadly mission.
Politicians, pundits and preachers
immediately began to speak out on the incident.
Our President waited a while, then spoke out, placing the blame on
"many sides." Later he spoke
out again, in anger, although his anger was directed mostly at the reporters
who questioned him.
Many more voices have since spoken out, some
criticizing the President for his failure to distance himself from the
far-right, but most speaking against "hate"; many also talked about
the need for our nation to "come together," whatever that means.
But is "hate" really the problem?
Webster (11th Collegiate Dictionary) defines
hates as "(n) 1a: intense hostility or aversion usually from fear, anger,
or sense of injury. b: extreme dislike
or antipathy: LOATHING (vt) 1: to feel extreme enmity toward. 2: to have a
strong aversion to: find very distasteful."
We all have felt or expressed hate in some
form or another, even if only by the milder definition ("I hate
broccoli."), although there are many things or actions we probably hate by
the stronger definition. So why do we
say that "hate" is the problem?
The Bible speaks of hate well over 100
times, often with variations that appear contradictory. It even speaks of God Himself hating. I don't plan to go there, but there are a few
passages that relate to God's people and their responsibility. Here are a few:
Leviticus
19:17. "You shall not hate your
brother in your heart ... "Psalm 97:10. "Hate evil, you who love the LORD."
Amos 5:15. "Hate evil, love good, and establish justice ... "
Matthew 5:43, 44. "You've heard that it was said, 'You shall love your neighbor and hate your enemy;' but I say to you, love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you..."
1 John 2:9 (also see 2:11; 3:15; 4:20) "Whoever says he is in the light and hates his brother is still in darkness."
If I may summarize - maybe oversimplifying a
bit - we who claim to be followers of Christ have no business hating any other
human being! We are to love them all -
even those who have it in for us. And
yet we are to hate evil. We have no
business tolerating it!
Was Jesus acting out of hate when He drove
out the money-changers? I believe He
was: hate for evil; hate for the
defilement of His Father's house; hate for the greed that was taking advantage
of the needs of pilgrims.
So back to Charlottesville. Yes there was hate on both sides. But we can't just decide that both sides were
equally in the wrong. We can't simply
say that love equals tolerance of evil.
One side represented a horrible evil:
Nazism, the Ku Klux Clan, as well as other groups of the same kind. These groups have a history, not of hate in
the abstract, but of violent acts of evil:
gas-chambers, mass-murder, lynching:
genocide in Europe and attempted genocide in the USA. Should we hate the evil these groups stand for? Yes!
Were those who were protesting these groups
equally responsible? No! Did they hate? Yes!
Undoubtedly some transferred their hatred of evil over to hatred of
evil-doers. But it is the Alt-Right that
advocates racism and terrorism; it was one of their group who committed an act
of terrorism that day!
We who claim to follow Christ cannot put the
blame only on an abstract "hate."
We must not simply promote a "love" that refuses to recognize
genuine evil. We must speak out against
the evil that is being promoted, not only at Charlottesville, but all over our
nation.
Remember Niemoller's words. (See blog:
NIEMOLLER FOR TODAY - 12/3/16)
No comments:
Post a Comment