I have been observing Pope Francis over the
two years he's been in office and have admired him almost from the
beginning. The other day I finally sat
down with my yellow pad and wrote out some thoughts which Uni and I
discussed. Uni types them and publishes
them on the blog. She had not yet done
so when not long after this, she awoke me from napping during the evening
news. She informed me that I might not
want to publish the post I had written; Francis had just said some things I may
not like.
Well we got online and found his comments
about the recent Charlie Hebdo massacre in Paris. Though he had previously condemned the act of
violence, he now apparently felt that he needed to do a little "blame the
victim." And though he seemed to be
attempting to be congenial, he rather came across as crude.
Some of his talk: "You have an obligation to speak
openly. We have that freedom. But without causing offense. It's true we cannot react violently, but if
Dr. Gasbarri here, a great friend, would say something insulting against my
mother, a punch awaits him. But it's
normal ... You cannot make
provocations. You cannot insult people's
faith. There is a limit ..."
So is Francis correct? If so, is he justifying the behavior of the
Islamic terrorists? Is he making the
religious views of others off limits for satire? Much of our humor in America seems to be
composed of just that.
Perhaps he has forgotten that many
Christians, including Roman Catholics are suffering, even being put to death in
Moslem lands. Their crime? Blasphemy - insulting the Prophet Muhammad by
claiming that Jesus is greater than he.
Or has he forgotten that during the Middle
Ages and the Reformation, those of his own church tortured and put many to
death for speaking out against them? Is
he justifying their actions? And yes,
Roman Catholics suffered at the hands of zealous Protestants?
Or perhaps he has not read of the Old
Testament prophets who mocked the competing "faiths" of their
day? Isaiah draws a verbal cartoon that
is definitely a lampoon of the idol worshippers of his day:
"The
ironsmith takes a cutting tool ... The
carpenter stretches a line; he marks it out with a pencil. He shapes it with planes and marks it with a
compass. He shapes it into the figure of
a man ... He cuts down cedars or he
chooses a cypress tree or an oak ...
Then it becomes fuel for a man.
He takes a part of it and warms himself; he kindles a fire and bakes
bread. Also he makes a god and worships
it; he makes it an idol and falls down before it. Half of it he burns in the fire. Over the half he eats meat ... And the rest of it he makes into a god, his
idol and falls down to it and worships it.
He prays to it and says, 'Deliver me, for you are my God!' ... No one
considers, nor is there knowledge or discernment to say, 'Half of it I burned
in the fire; I also baked bread on its coals; I roasted meat and have
eaten. And shall I make the rest of it
an abomination? Shall I fall down before
a block of wood?'" (Isaiah 44:12-19
- ESV)
There are plenty more where this came
from! Of course, the prophets frequently
suffered the same kind of holy wrath that the cartoonists at Charlie Hebdo
suffered.
Move into the New Testament. How about John the Baptist referring to the
religious people of his day as a "nest of snakes"? (Matthew 3:7)
Wasn't he mocking their faith?
And then Jesus used that same expression at
least twice on those same religious people (Matthew 12:34; 23:33). In fact, the first 33 verses of Matthew 23
are filled with scathing pictures of those religious people of Jesus' day - the
same religion that Jesus belonged to!
The hyperbole and metaphors He uses bring up pictures in the readers'
minds that could be perceived as cartoons.
"
... they make their phylacteries (Scripture boxes they wore on their foreheads
and wrists) broad and their fringes long" (Matthew 23:5)." ... you travel all over land and sea to make one convert and whenever he converts you make him into twice the son of hell you are" (verse 15).
" ... blind guides ... " (verse 16). Elsewhere He says, " ... if the blind guides the blind, they'll both fall in the ditch!" (15:14).
" ... straining out a gnat and swallowing a camel" (23:24).
" ... you clean the outside of the cup and the dish, but inside they are full of greed and self-indulgence!" (verse 25).
And of course we know where this kind of
sarcasm got Jesus.
I've been warned by nice people of all persuasions
- fundamentalists, atheists and others in between - that sarcasm and satire
should not be used, that it signifies a weak argument or that it is
hurtful. Sometimes I simply reply,
"Tell it to Jesus" or "Read the Bible" or "Read any
good literature."
Our American culture is filled with sarcasm,
satire and lampooning. Admittedly much
of it may seem crude and tasteless, though you may want to read Ezekiel 16,
where Israel is compared to an old whore who is so undesirable that she has
to pay her "lovers."
In many ways the cartoonists and late-night
comedians of today fill in the space that was once occupied by the
prophets. They point out to us the hypocrisies
and inconsistencies of our politicians, pundits and preachers. Most of their sarcasm is spent not on our
faith but upon its practitioners, and much of the time we deserve it and could
even learn from it. Sometimes they seem
to understand the requirements of our faith better than we do.
I even attempt satire at times, though
apparently I'm not succeeding very well; I've received no death threats!
No comments:
Post a Comment