Paul
asks 3 questions in Galatians 1:10 (at least as I have punctuated it). The answer to the first is obviously yes, as
we can see in his remarks to the Corinthians and the references in Acts. Though he uses many other words (reason,
dialogue, etc.), it seems clear that his goal was to persuade.
2
Corinthians 5:11: "Since then we
know the fear of the Lord, we persuade people, but we are open before
God, and I hope also to be open in your consciences."
Acts
18:4: "And he was reasoning in the
synagogue every Sabbath and he was persuading both Jews and Greeks."
Acts
19:8: "And entering into the
synagogue he was speaking boldly for three months, reasoning and persuading
the things concerning the Kingdom of God."
Acts
26:28: ”And Agrippa said to Paul, 'In a
little bit you're persuading me to be a Christian.'"
Acts
28:23: " ... he expounded to them,
solemnly testifying to them the Kingdom of God, persuading them
concerning Jesus from the Law of Moses and the prophets from morning until
evening."
Of
what was Paul trying to persuade people?
I believe Agrippa understood. He
was persuading them to become Christians, to become believers in and followers
of Jesus Christ and citizens of the Kingdom of God.
His
methods of persuasion may have differed, as we read in the Book of Acts and in
his epistles. When he dealt with Jews --
those who had the Bible -- he used the Bible to persuade; when he dealt with
gentiles -- those who did not have the Bible -- he used whatever means and
arguments were available, natural revelation, or even their own religious
beliefs. Though he denied trying to "please men" he did all
that he could to remove barriers. He
"became all things to all that he might save some" (1 Corinthians
9:21).
Shouldn't
this be our goal? Shouldn't we also, by
our words and actions be doing all that we can to persuade people to come to
Christ? I pray that this may always be
my goal in all conversation, even though it may not be verbal. And in this blog I pray that though it may
not always be the main goal of a particular post it may lie beneath the surface
in all that I write. And I especially
pray that nothing I say would persuade others otherwise. If so, I hope my readers will correct me.
I'm
afraid and saddened however, that some Christians and many preachers do not
have this as their goal, but see themselves less as trying to be like Paul and
his great example Jesus and more as emulating the prophets of the Old Covenant,
ranting against the sins of the world.
They
forget (or never realized) that the prophets' burden was to bring God's Old Testament
people in line, while the New Testament witness is to bring people to faith in
Christ.
And
I find myself being criticized for not being like them, for allegedly
"calling evil good and vice versa."
I don't believe I have done any such thing.
While I hope that I won't hesitate to repent and apologize when I err (which I do frequently) and am corrected, I make no apologies for not conforming to others' criteria. I pray that in my case the answer to Paul's second question will be no, and to the third will also be no.
1 comment:
Thank you for this. You have brought great verses into remembrance. When we witness we need to do it to please Christ and not fear men.
Evangelism should always be verbal though. We witness with out words. Faith comes by hearing and hearing the word of God.
Always in order for those to come to faith in Christ they must hear about sin. If they do not understand sin they will not understand the gospel.
In Christ :)
Post a Comment