Uni and I like to watch movies at home. At times we have difficulty determining which
to watch out of the nearly infinite selection available. Lately we've been watching some movies of the
type often labeled "chick flicks" - those with some sort of romantic
interest - no shoot-em-ups, no car chases, but lots of sad faces, tears, kisses
and occasional bedroom scenes.
What got me to thinking as I watched the last
three was the common depiction of the female lead as having some sort of
weakness or need that the male character in some way attempted to meet.
The Notebook - She is an elderly
woman who suffers from dementia - loss of memory - which her husband tenderly
attempts to recover by reading the story of their romance from her
notebook/diary.
Labor Day - She is a single
mother, living with her preteen son. Her
husband has left her for another woman because of her depression over her
inability to have more children and she feels she can never love again. But she finds love from an escaped convict
who chooses to hide out in her home.
Seven Pounds - She is dying from
congenital heart failure, when the male character, trying to find personal
atonement for his past, literally gives her his heart.
I'm not trying to make light of these
movies. I cried along with Uni through
the pathos, perhaps even more than she.
But I was struck by the common theme.
My first thoughts were of how old-fashioned
and outdated these stories seemed to be.
We live in an age of feminine empowerment. In our lifetime we've seen women's roles
change dramatically - women taking on activities that were not long ago thought
of as only the province of men. The
women in these movies seemed weak by "modern" standards. (Of course, the men had their weaknesses
too.)
But a passage from the New Testament kept
coming to mind. "You husbands
likewise, living together with them in an understanding way, as with a weaker
vessel, granting your wives honor, as fellow heirs of the grace of life, so
that your prayers may not be hindered" (1 Peter 3:7).
This verse is packed, but it is the phrase
"weaker vessel" that stands out to me, especially after watching
these three movies. And it is this
phrase that has caused much debate in various Bible studies that I have led or
been involved in. There are those men
who take this as somehow granting them license to dominate. There are those women who question the
description of them as "weaker".
Arguments from traditional male dominance; arguments concerning relative
body strength, upper and lower body strength, child-bearing - I've heard them
all. But is this what it's all about -
physical comparison between the sexes?
A little context might help: Peter is addressing believers who are scattered
in a hostile environment. He addresses
his readers as "strangers and pilgrims." They appear to be recent converts from
paganism with all its vices. They have
to live among people who are suspicious of their behavior.
Peter exhorts them to live lives of exemplary
behavior as a witness of what it means to be a follower of Jesus. One of his recurring instructions is to "submit"
in their human relationships - "to every human institution" (2:13);
"slaves to masters" (2:18); "to their leaders" (5:5); and
most importantly in our text, "wives to husbands," especially if the
husbands are unbelievers (3:1).
So when Peter urges husbands to do
"likewise," he is urging that same submissive spirit on them as on
their wives. It is to be a
characteristic of every follower of Jesus.
This passage is not making a comparison
between the relative strength and weakness of men and women. It is an exhortation addressed to men -
husbands - about how they are to relate to their wives. The burden is on us!
Because this verse has been misinterpreted
and misapplied in so many ways, I feel it's necessary to say a little about
what it does not say. It doesn't
say that the wife is the weaker vessel.
Nor does it say that she is the husband's vessel.
The husband and wife are two
"vessels" in the household of God.
This is an analogy that is used elsewhere in Scripture. They are called "fellow heirs" -
two members of equal importance to God.
Because the society of Peter's day was relatively patriarchal - male
dominated, there was a need for stressing this equality of the wife and the
husband.
And then note this: he is to live together with her and grant her
honor (or value) as with a weaker vessel. That "as" is important. It speaks not of the physical condition she
is in but of how she is to be treated.
It means that I am to regard my wife as
something special. I am to handle her
with care. This can mean many things and
can be carried out in many ways, but it always means that I owe her special
treatment. I must protect her from
danger. I must take note of her actual
weaknesses. I must listen.
I must handle her like fine China!
At this point it would be easy for me to make
a list of the various things that I do or have done in this regard and tell
every husband reading this that these are his oughts. But that would end up in frustrating legalism. My advice:
get to know her. If you think you
already know her well enough, you're doing better than I am after over 60 years
with Uni` (57 years of marriage).
And be gentle; don't be afraid of
embarrassing her or yourself. She'll let
you know what she likes and what her needs are.
This past Friday Uni and I attended a wedding
of a young couple. Though most of the
ceremony was traditional, there was one surprise, one thing we had not seen
before.
The groom got down on his knees, carefully
removed his bride's shoes and washed her feet!